Lesson 8 · ClaudeTag · Capstone

Putting It Together

When to reach for ClaudeTag vs Claude Code — and an interleaved self-test across the whole course.

~8 min · builds on Lessons 1–7 · Mission: better Prism/agent prompts

1. The decision: ClaudeTag or Claude Code?

They're one lineage — Anthropic calls ClaudeTag "the beginning of an evolution of Claude Code."[ref §8] The split is about mode, not capability:

Claude CodeClaudeTag
You arein the loop, turn by turndelegating; it works async
Best fordeep hands-on work in a repoa standing duty a team watches
Initiativereactiveproactive (ambient)
Memorysession / files you supplypersistent, channel-scoped

Rule of thumb: reach for Claude Code when you are driving a hard change; reach for ClaudeTag when a recurring duty should run where the team can see it — triage, on-call, status, monitoring.

2. The whole course in one arc

You designed a complete prism-ops ClaudeTag, one lesson at a time:

  1. Contract — objective, tools, instructions, budget (L1)
  2. Scope — least-privilege Access bundle for Prism (L2)
  3. Proactive — ambient guardian with an escalation ladder (L3)
  4. Fleet — separate identities, walled memories (L4)
  5. Delegate — a task that decomposes cleanly (L5)
  6. Curate — a governed, secret-free memory (L6)
  7. Govern — fail-closed spend + audited actions (L7)

The one idea underneath all of it: a great agent setup is a scoped, budgeted, audited delegation contract — in Slack or anywhere else. That's the transferable win for every prompt you write.

3. Self-test (interleaved)

Questions jump across lessons on purpose — mixing topics is what turns fluency into durable recall.

Which belongs in the "constraints" part of a delegation task?

Constraints bound what the agent may do and its risk (L5). The spend cap is budget-clause governance (L1/L7); channel membership isn't part of the task.

Ambient mode goes silent through a real incident. Most likely cause?

Loudness is judged against the baseline (L3). Too loose → it misses the real event. The audit log records actions but doesn't drive alerts; membership is irrelevant.

Why should #research and #prism-ops be separate identities?

Separate identities = separate blast radii: least-privilege tools + isolated memory (L4). It's not about speed, and a Claude can serve many channels.

A task exceeds the spend cap. The safe, actual behaviour is:

Fail-closed: declined entirely, not partial (L7) — the same instinct as your risk controls. No half-runs, no silent credit draw.

A months-old channel memory cites a burned account. You should:

Memory is "true when written" and admins can edit/delete it (L6). Curate stale entries; it doesn't self-refresh and caps are unrelated.

Your win — the course

You can explain ClaudeTag, decide when to use it, design a scoped and governed one for Prism, and — the actual mission — write the delegation contracts that make any agent behave. That's the whole thing.

Keep learning — communities The product is new; the wisdom will come from practitioners. r/ClaudeAI for real setups as they surface, and the Anthropic Discord for beta scoping questions.
Ask your teacher Want to make it real? Bring me a live subagent (scout, trading-medic, the guardian) and we'll port it into the full contract → scope → ambient → govern form, end to end.